Sharing Infidelity

For many members of Generation X – Americans born between 1961 and 1981 – “sharing” often has a negative connotation.  Sharing sexual partners spread HIV/AIDS in the 1980s and 1990s.  So did sharing needles.  In the 1990s and 2000s, we learned that sharing ideas leads to lawsuits and lost fortunes.

So it is of little surprise that members of Generation X, now parents, are horrified to learn that their teenage children are sharing their online passwords with their boyfriends and girlfriends (you can read about it here).  Where did Generation X go wrong?

Marriage.  Marriage is where Generation X went wrong.

To its credit, Generation X is committed to better marriages than it experienced as the children of Baby Boomers.  As a result, the divorce rate has dropped almost 30% since the early 1980s.  However, it still hovers around 45%, which is tragic.

What does this have to do with teenagers sharing their online passwords?

According to a study by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, the past five years have seen a dramatic rise in the amount of electronic data used as evidence in divorce hearings.  Generation X is using private e-mail accounts and social networks to carry out its extramarital affairs.

Kids see the damage to relationships caused by online privacy, and they respond by eliminating the privacy.  They share.  Generation X may fault this logic, but I see something kind of beautiful in choosing romance over privacy.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr

From SpongeBob to Bosch

A new article by Angeline Lillard and Jennifer Peterson in Pediatrics indicates that four year-olds have a difficult time focusing immediately after watching nine minutes of a fast-paced cartoon (i.e., SpongeBob SquarePants). You can read it here.

A recent article by Costas Karageorghis and David-Lee Pries in the Sport Journal describes ten years of research indicating that fast-paced music helps individuals increase the intensity and duration of physical activity.  You can read it here.

An unpublished account of my own wife’s behavior indicates that she cannot fall asleep to True Blood on HBO.

I mention these three separate observations to make this point:  the best paintings, sculptures, television programs, music, movies and other forms of mediated reality change the observer.  They motivate us to laugh, cry, reflect, or move.

Expecting that a good, fast-paced cartoon would doing anything but motivate kids to jump around is as absurd as expecting that an exhibit of the collected works of Hieronymus Bosch would motivate patrons to bake cupcakes.

We all want our children to focus, to concentrate, to be healthy and to use their abilities to the fullest.  Conflicting reports and “magic bullet” solutions only make this harder.  It is why I object to the tone of Lillard and Peterson’s article.  Banning fast-paced cartoons is not a panacea.  It will not guarantee improved academic performance, but being a parent might.

Kids need parents.   They need parents to create environments where success can happen.  According to Lillard and Peterson’s data (which I believe), this might mean not allowing our kids to watch fast-paced cartoons (or play high-energy videogames, or listen to fast-tempo music) before or during studies.  It might mean setting an appropriate environment, with the right lighting and sound, for sleep.  It also might mean using Tom and Jerry to motivate kids to move around and get that much-needed physical exercise.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr

Let Grandpa Drive

Be honest. Do you worry about your kids’ safety when their grandparents, your parents, drive them places? Do you worry about your safety when your parents drive you places?

A little bit?

A lot?

One of my daughter’s grandparents drives like a New York City cab driver; all acceleration and breaking with no in-between. (I can write this even though they read this blog because I know he/she will think I am referring to one of the other three.)

But it is not just their behavior behind the wheel that frightens us, is it? Grandparents are horrible when it comes to seatbelts and child safety seats. After all, they did not need them when they were raising us, and we (the lucky survivors) turned out OK.

Well, fear no more!

A new study published in Pediatrics, my favorite academic journal, reveals that our kids are safer driving with their grandparents than they are driving with us. When their grandchildren are in the car, grandparents get into far fewer accidents than parents do when our children are in the car. Moreover, when there is an accident and children are in the car, children are twice as likely to be injured if they are riding with their parents than if they are riding with their grandparents.

I know. I was shocked, too. But the research is solid.

Before I let grandparents off of the hook too quickly, I would like to note that, when they are driving alone, people over the age of 60 are more likely to be involved in accidents than younger adults. Moreover, the study also found that children who drive with their grandparents are less likely to be optimally restrained.

The study’s authors conclude that grandparents adopt safer driving practices when their grandchildren are in the car, which is awesome. Our parents love our children, apparently more than they loved us.

If you let your kids’ grandparents drive your kids, do so with increased confidence and the warm feeling that comes from knowing how much they care about their grandchildren. Then check the safety belts.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr